Imagine turning down an investment that reliably provides a 13% return. That’s the ROI (return on investment) found by a study on “comprehensive, high-quality, birth-to-five early education” by Nobel laureate James J. Heckman and his team. Yet federal budgetary priorities for the current administration have shifted away from social programs, such as early education, that help people in poverty. At the same time, the wealthiest earners and corporations are paying lower taxes. I used to think such policies were simply shortsighted, but after understanding many of the effects of policy changes in the President’s current and previous administration, I believe there is an intentional plan to favor those at the top of our society over the rest of us.
So here we are almost a decade into an experiment of governing differently. Are we great yet? This solidly middle class person felt disenfranchised from the beginning as programs I held dear and that I felt were necessary for caring for others began being dismantled. For example, as a parent who had been involved in educational accountability and who contacted my senator to no avail about the direction of the Department of Education, I saw a chosen leader who knew nothing about public school programs begin to destroy them in favor of providing funds to parents to use in private education. That’s when it hit me that the goals had changed. What was said sounded like caring for all kids, but the actions showed the opposite. I started to wonder whether the real agenda was to keep smart kids from other classes of people out of competition for college and important roles in society. Reduction in early childhood access is just one of the beginning steps on that journey.
The America I was born into told me that people who worked hard found opportunities. I was privileged to be born into a family that could spend time with me–and provide me with activities such as music lessons, dance classes, sports teams, and 4-H club. And books–so many books. My parents were first generation college graduates–thanks to working their way through school as well as my dad having access to the GI Bill for additional studies after he returned home from Korea. Though we were solidly part of the burgeoning middle class, we needed to make choices–such as setting aside monthly amounts toward buying instruments or my mom taking a second job to help with college costs.
While the America of my birth didn’t offer equal opportunities for everyone, it was in the process of expanding who got to participate and how to do so. According to History.com, “[t]he Great Society was an ambitious series of policy initiatives, legislation and programs spearheaded by President Lyndon B. Johnson with the main goals of ending poverty, reducing crime, abolishing inequality and improving the environment.” Early childhood education and learning was a pillar of the Great Society.
By the time I graduated from college, America was already contracting in ways that would shrink the middle class and reduce opportunities for hard workers–from the bottom or the middle–looking to get ahead. Many of today’s young people–regardless of education level or race or ethnic background–feel as if owning a home, starting a family, or getting a college education are life activities people like them cannot access in today’s economy. Those who can do so often thanks to financial help from older relatives.
Again, if this were solely about money, surely someone would realize that if fewer people participate in the economy, eventually the economy will slow down.
I’m more and more feeling like the income inequality is the point. The qualification for who gets to lead is being born to the right people in the right class–which feels like the very opposite of what our country was supposed to be, even if we never really achieved our lofty goals in that area. Many policies especially seem targeted to keep people of color–regardless of income–out of power centers. How many times has our leader touted “good genes”?
I don’t feel these types of leaders care what studies say about lifting people out of poverty. Despite their love of money, they love the ability to keep all the goodies to themselves even more. No more social climbers with their crazy ideas of spreading opportunities to all.
Speaking of–the rich, famous, successful, and powerful Dolly Parton died yesterday (Aug. 25, 2026). Despite what many currently at the top of power are saying, I think they would prefer someone like her, who grew up poor, not go on to build her foundation–Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library–that helps families create “richer home literacy environments.” According to the library’s website, it gifted its 200 millionth book in 2023. Thanks to Dolly, a whole lot of kids have had access to a whole lot of books–and learning.
The current leaders don’t seem to want public or private money to bring about returns on investments that lift people out of poverty. How sad to fear scarcity if others also have access and power instead of imagining the abundance we could all create and share if more people participated in economic security. That’s the kind of ROI many of us will keep working toward even as those in charge attempt to crash human potential.
Imagine with me.











Recent Comments